The Foundation for Constitutional Democracy

06-Jan-2008

Yahrzeit 2007

Filed under: JudaismPoliticiansZionism/NationalismBELIEFS & PERSPECTIVES — eidelberg @ 7:37 am Edit This

Speech by Meir Jolowitz on the occasion of the 17th yahrzeit of Rabbi Meir Kahane, ob”m.

Something terrible is happening to Israel.

There is a war being fought, and the people of Israel don’t even know it.

And we ask the question:

Does anyone notice?

Does anybody care?

**

It happened only a few years ago.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak invited Yasir Arafat, a mass murderer, into his home in the exclusive community of Kochav Yair, on Erev Shabbat. (more…)

02-Jan-2008

Why No Revolution in Israel

Filed under: Democratic MethodsBELIEFS & PERSPECTIVES — eidelberg @ 5:54 am Edit This

Let us start the “New Year” right with a dose of truth, without which Israel has no future.

People wonder why there has been no revolution in Israel. They see that one government after another, especially since the Rabin government of 1993-95, has been betraying the country, has been yielding Jewish land to Israel’s most implacable enemies, Muslim Arabs who openly proclaim their commitment to wiping Israel off the map.

This genocidal objective is not only conspicuous in the pronouncements of Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. It is not only conspicuous and in the Charter of the PLO-Palestinian Authority, which calls for “the complete liberation of Palestine.” It is not only conspicuous in the Hamas Charter, which states: “Israel will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it.” (more…)

Civil Disobedience Versus Sedition

Filed under: Constitution & RightsDemocratic MethodsOslo/Peace Process — eidelberg @ 5:33 am Edit This

MK Aryeh Eldad, responding to Prime Minister Olmert’s ban on further construction in Judea and Samaria is calling for “civil disobedience.” I wonder whether he fully understands what he is up against?

Olmert’s decision is perhaps the first tangible consequence of the Annapolis Conference, which sanctions the establishment of a Palestinian state by the end of 2008. Of course, a Palestinian state was tacitly agreed upon when the Rabin government signed the Oslo or Israel-PLO Agreement of September 1993. It thus appears that Mr. Eldad’s call for “civil disobedience” against Olmert’s ban on construction in Judea and Samaria is actually a protest against Oslo.

This recalls Moshe Feiglin’s “civil disobedience” in 1995, when he organized demonstrations across Israel blocking main intersections in protest against Oslo. The following year, however, Mr. Feiglin was convicted of sedition for what he had naively termed civil disobedience! (more…)

“Surrender Is Not An Option”—Perhaps, Perhaps Not

Filed under: Oslo/Peace ProcessUS & Global Policy — eidelberg @ 5:02 am Edit This

Edited transcript of the Eidelberg Report, Israel National Radio, December 31, 2007.

Two Munichs occurred in 2007: (1) the U.S. National Intelligence Estimate, and (2) the U.S-sponsored Annapolis Conference. The two Munichs may lead to a world war that destroys what is left of a decaying Western civilization.

The National Intelligence Estimate reported that Iran had stopped its nuclear-weapons development program in 2003. This gives Iran the green light to complete that program. A nuclear-armed Iran will control Saudi Arabia as well as pacifist Europe on which America’s economy and survival depend. Of course, a nuclear-armed Iran dooms Israel.

The Annapolis Conference buys time for the United States, while Israel retreats to its indefensible 1949 borders to accommodate the establishment of Palestinian state which, in a second stage orchestrated by Iran, will cover all of Palestine.

Pundits attribute the first mentioned Munich to a “shadow government” in the American State Department working in conjunction with dovish elements in American intelligence agencies. (more…)

01-Jan-2008

The True Descent of Man

Filed under: EthicsJudaismBELIEFS & PERSPECTIVES — eidelberg @ 1:03 am Edit This

Countless people still believe in the Darwinian hypothesis concerning the descent of man. To this day die-hard evolutionists contend that mankind—homo sapiens—evolved from lower forms of life through a process of chance mutation and natural selection; and this process is said to be progressive.

To state the matter more graphically: Many learned professors proudly boast that we (and they) are nothing more than clever orangutans. And these professors bristle with indignation should we take issue with them. It were as if we had offended their honor by denying their descent—a curious characteristic of these neo-orangutans, no?

At the risk of being called a Neanderthal it seems to me that the evolutionary hypothesis—it is not a scientific theory—is a modern hoax. (more…)

      « Previous Page