The Foundation for Constitutional Democracy

02-Jul-2008

Troubling Questions and Unpleasant Facts

Filed under: Israel’s SovereigntyUS & Global Policy — eidelberg @ 6:06 am Edit This

If you are Jewish and have a stitch of Jewish pride, are you sick and tired of hearing how this or that president, or how this or that presidential candidate, is “good for Israel”?

Has there ever been an American Secretary of State—with the possible exception of Alexander Haig, who was promptly eased out of office—that has been “good for Israel”?

Do you know of a single American politician that emphatically opposes or campaigns against the establishment of a Palestinian state? Does Senator Joseph Lieberman?

Do you realize that all this talk about how this or that American president or politician is “good for Israel” renders Israel all the more pathetic and degrades the Jewish people?

Do you realize that American Zionist organizations that lobby for Israel have had no discernible, positive impact on Israel’s government, that is, have not affected Israel’s suicidal policy of territorial retreat, hence, have not made Israel’s government more sane or more Zionist? (more…)

01-Jul-2008

The Same Old National Camp: Going Nowhere

Filed under: Democratic MethodsDomestic PolicyPoliticians — eidelberg @ 6:26 am Edit This

Edited transcript of the Eidelberg Report, Israel National Radio, June 30, 2008.

It has been reported that concerned citizens in Beit El recently invited several leaders of the “political right” to a panel discussion on the proper course for the ‘national camp’ in the next Knesset elections. Only two politicians turned up: Knesset Member Effie Eitam, who is heading a new faction called Achi (”My Brother”) within the National Union party, and Moshe Feiglin, head of the Jewish Leadership faction within the Likud party, whose ambition is take over that party.

The two politicians offered different approaches as to the best strategy for the national camp. Eitam emphasized “political unity” among the so-called nationalist parties. Feiglin focused on the ultimate goal of installing what he calls a “faith-based, ideological leadership for the nation as a whole.”

Although the reported positions of these two religious politicians are not contradictory in theory, they are not harmonious in fact, since most members of the so-called national camp are not religious. What most unites the parties composing the national camp is opposition to territorial withdrawal. This is a 30-year old story that dates back to Camp David 1978. (more…)

Speculations Regarding Obama

Filed under: Islam & ArabPoliticiansThe Media — eidelberg @ 6:06 am Edit This

After reading “Israel Insider” commentary (below) regarding Barack Obama, ponder the following speculations:

If Obama has Islamic inclinations and wins the 2008 presidential election:

  1. It may multiply the number of mosques in the United States.
  2. It may increase the number of Muslims immigrating to the United States.
  3. It may increase the number of Muslims in key position in government, especially the State Department.
  4. It may increase the number of Hezbollah and other Islamic “sleeper cells.”
  5. It may diminished freedom of speech and press by suppressing criticism of Islam. (more…)

      « Previous Page